I’m not a huge reader but despite its length I found this article quite riveting. The history of fashion particularly the 19th and 20th centuries had many new fascinating trends and innovations. I do agree that this new age of individual freedom and decline in the occasion has had many detrimental effects though I doubt many would be disappointed. However as someone who believes its best to impress and that dressing for the occasion is in fact an act of humility I am inclined to share the same feelings as the author Mr. Boyer. I wouldn’t mind if we attempted to conduct a reversal to the simpler days of old.
Archives For November 30, 1999
“Will you deny all ungodliness and worldly lusts, and live soberly, righteously, and godly in this present world; that you may show yourself in all things an example of good works unto others, that the adversary may be ashamed, having nothing to say against you?”
I agree with Hitchens interpretation of great men’s deeds. I think its incredibly foolish to expect for someone to be perfect when we know full well that all men have fallen short in their own way. This is one of the reasons why I admire different things various individuals have done but would never ignore their temptations as well. Nobody is perfect. The article on Mr. Bell was quite interesting and makes me want to learn more about this intelligent and culturally vibrant individual. I agree also that the Anglican church and Episcopalian one are in this day in age laughable because they are content to ascribe to the world’s standards and not God’s.
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/11/in-defense-of-george-bell
Reductio ad absurdum. I think this article does an excellent job at summing up New Atheist arguments and why they don’t hold up well in defense of their positions. It does often appear that New Atheists are of the absurd belief that ceasing religion entirely will not bring about any possible negative consequences. Or at least they are not compelled to ponder such possibilities. I will have to do some reading up on A.C. Grayling.
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2010/05/believe-it-or-not
Some important points were brought up in this article which highlight the overarching problems with the politicization of science. Science is not a religion or belief system but a method by which we utilize our intellect to better understand the physical world. It is not a method for establishing morality nor is it an authority in the realm of politics. It truly appears that these pseudo-pop-scientists are content to promote political advocacy by masquerading as a scientific authority whose claims must be revered. I agree with the conclusion that if these “scientists” continue to discredit science in the same vain that the media has been discredited then we are in for some serious trouble.
https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/04/the-real-anti-science
I agree with the sentiments of this article and have found it to convey my personal opinions on the French election best. France is in dire straits and this presidential election is not going to solve the overarching problems which have plagued France for decades. Like in the US, France is divided and in search of an identity. Moreover it is stuck between two ideological opposites vying for control of the helm of the nation. The future in my estimations is bleak with increased possibilities of war and civil strife.
https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/04/france-is-a-broken-country#login
Interesting article which challenges the idea that liberal principles and individual liberty are mere white European constructs. Those ascribing to identity politics won’t be pleased to have their narrative challenged. This also goes for ethno nationalists who scoff at the notion that certain civilizations are not capable of such enlightened thought.
https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/leithart/2017/04/african-selves
Acerbity [əˈsɜːbɪtɪ] 